<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Facilitating Change &#187; impact of technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://facilitatingchange.org/tag/impact-of-technology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://facilitatingchange.org</link>
	<description>one butterfly flapping its wings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 14:29:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The getting of knowledge should be smelly</title>
		<link>http://facilitatingchange.org/2009/09/the-getting-of-knowledge-should-be-smelly/</link>
		<comments>http://facilitatingchange.org/2009/09/the-getting-of-knowledge-should-be-smelly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 05:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Essays & Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buffy the Vampire Slayer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I  Robot... You  Jane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupert Giles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.facilitatingchange.org/?p=989</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Smell is the most powerful trigger to the memory there is. A certain flower, or a-a whiff of smoke can bring up experiences long forgotten. Books smell musty and-and-and rich. The knowledge gained from a computer is a - it, uh, it has no-no texture, no-no context. It's-it's there and then it's gone. If it's to last, then-then the getting of knowledge should be, uh, tangible, it should be, um, smelly.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blogging hiatus over the summer. Slowly getting back. Decided to start watching <em>Buffy the Vampire Slayer</em>. So many of my friends have mentioned it — how it&#8217;s more that what it seems on the surface. So far, I&#8217;ve found that to be true.</p>
<p>I just watched <em><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I,_Robot..._You,_Jane">I, Robot&#8230; You, Jane</a> </em>(Season 1, Episode 8). Woven throughout the story is  a debate  between the librarian, Giles, and the computer science teacher, Jenny, about adopting technology. Giles is uneasy about technology: &#8220;I don&#8217;t think something is good just because it&#8217;s new.&#8221; (Although many <em>Buffy </em>episodes  feature a hacker, Willow, who provides Giles with critical assistance using the library&#8217;s  computer.)</p>
<p>Jenny explains that technology is creating a new society. Her students echo this: &#8220;The printed page is obsolete. Information isn&#8217;t bound up anymore. It&#8217;s an entity. If you&#8217;re not jacked in you&#8217;re not alive.&#8221; Giles is horrified. (And that particular student later gets killed by a nasty demon.) Near the end of the show Jenny asks Giles why he has such an aversion to  computers:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong><em>Jenny:</em> </strong>Honestly, what is it about them that bothers you so much?<br />
<strong><em>Giles:</em></strong> The smell.<br />
<strong><em>Jenny:</em></strong> Computers don&#8217;t smell, Rupert.<br />
<em><strong>Giles:</strong> </em>I know. Smell is the most powerful trigger to the memory there is. A certain flower, or a-a whiff of smoke can bring up experiences long forgotten. Books smell musty and-and-and rich. The knowledge gained from a computer is a &#8211; it, uh, it has no-no texture, no-no context. It&#8217;s-it&#8217;s there and then it&#8217;s gone. If it&#8217;s to last, then-then the getting of knowledge should be, uh, tangible, it should be, um, smelly.</p></blockquote>
<p>Clearly I love my computer. And sometimes I hate it. Have not been sniffing my books enough lately. Something to think about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://facilitatingchange.org/2009/09/the-getting-of-knowledge-should-be-smelly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can&#8217;t focus anymore? Neither can we.</title>
		<link>http://facilitatingchange.org/2008/06/nicholas-carr-decreasing-attention/</link>
		<comments>http://facilitatingchange.org/2008/06/nicholas-carr-decreasing-attention/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 23:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consume This]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jakob Nielsen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nicholas Carr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writing for online media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.facilitatingchange.org/?p=14</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Once I was a scuba diver in the sea of words. Now I zip along the surface like a guy on a Jet Ski." Nicholas Carr has written a wonderful article — Is Google Making Us Stupid? — on how consuming content online may be imparing our ability to concentrate.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Once I was a scuba diver in the sea of words. Now I zip along the surface like a guy on a Jet Ski.&#8221; <a href="http://www.roughtype.com/">Nicholas Carr</a> has written a wonderful article — <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/print/200807/google"><em>Is Google Making Us Stupid?</em></a> — on how consuming content online may be imparing our ability to concentrate. Much of it resonated with me: skimming instead of reading, terrible trouble focusing, the books I love so much now abandoned. Wow. Nice to know I&#8217;m not alone. Also ironic, given that for years I&#8217;ve been helping folks write for online media — emphasizing always that <a href="http://www.useit.com/papers/webwriting/">users don&#8217;t read, they skim</a> (thanks, <a href="http://www.useit.com/jakob/">Jakob Nielsen</a>&#8230; uh&#8230; I think).</p>
<p><em>Disclaimer: I was not able to read the whole article before I was compelled to stop and write this post. And check my email. Twice. So, for now, I can vouch only that the beginning is wonderful. </em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://facilitatingchange.org/2008/06/nicholas-carr-decreasing-attention/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

